Sindala dialogue workshop — testing the evolution proposal

User-authorized proposal-stage dialogue workshop. Local companion: languages/sindala/dialogue-workshop-proposal.md. Linguistic sources: languages/sindala/evolution-proposal.html (proposal), source/sindala.export.html and source/sindala.vulgar.txt, generated/lexicon.csv and generated/language.json; languages/sigtaara/generated/lexicon.csv. Canon grounding: species.firgol.sentient.lahkiin.kaemisaedhel, species.firgol.sentient.lahkiin.kaekreaedhel, species.firgol.sentient.lahkiin.zaetaedhel. All scenes, constructions, and historical extrapolations are proposed. No canon changes requested.

In Review 0/2 items resolved

Proposal workspace — not canon. Accepting an item records your review decision. Writing it into canon requires a separate exact preview and typed confirmation. Overview items are never imported.

Review the whole package · 2 items

Mechanical consistency

Canon impact

Targets and conflicts are derived without a model call. Overview items are omitted — they never touch canon.

Five dialogue scenes and provisional grammar findingsmapping required

Kind: Prose
Target: mapping required

✓ No mechanical conflict detected

Selected item

Workshop overview

Candidate Overviewv1

Overview frames this package for review. It is never written to canon.

Manual revision

Title Text

# Sindala dialogue workshop

Proposal only. Five invented dialogue scenes test the evolution proposal: eyewitness account, disputed inherited memory, household argument, formal petition, and joke. The workshop pairs English exchanges with short constructed Sindala clauses using exported vocabulary and surface grammar forms; it does not claim complete or validated translations.

## Item map

The workshop item contains all five scenes, a limited witness/witnesses sound-change calculation, provisional design decisions, and linked source notes. It is a language-design proposal with illustrative dialogue, not a historical event or finished story.

## Main findings

- Test historical cir- as received-account past; ordinary dal- remains neutral about evidence.
- Keep object-first available while exploring subject-first discourse uses.
- Preserve vu / hon / dun as hear / heed / obey.
- Explore respectful plural through reciprocal social choices.
- Leave pronoun leveling, habitual remote past, quotation rules, and general inflectional paradigms unresolved.

## Review boundary

No language imports, canon records, or map data were changed. Approval of the overall direction should not be read as approval of every trial sentence or memory-transfer assumption. Further grammar decisions need separate review.

What changed?

AI action · one call

Action Personality Provider Model Instruction